Freedom, on the brink

By Steve Woodward

The question arose without provocation: “Is it true that we are supposed to be the best country?”

It was posed by a middle school teen-ager with whom I spend time as a mentor. He lives in poverty among three younger siblings. He has been homeless. He is often hungry. But he is cheerful and inquisitive, conversant and funny. And despite having little reason to be optimistic, and despite the strong likelihood he never has been told by a teacher or any other adult about American exceptionalism, the young man’s intuition is that he is the citizen of a remarkable country, the best one.

Given this unexpected opportunity, this “teachable moment”, I needed to deliver a quick answer, something that would resonate within his impressionable mind.

We are the most free country, I said first. No other country comes close. We are a country where anything is possible, where dreams come true every day. I might have added to this, I might have embellished further, maybe by citing a rags-to-riches story. But I also wanted to impress upon him that dreams come true because work is rewarded and opportunities to work are plentiful.

It no longer is a reasonable assumption that kids are aware that being an American is a blessing and a privilege. The narratives tell them we are a nation born of racist slave owners, who left an indelible stain; that capitalism is rigged and excludes almost everyone, and, worse, is the principal cause of climate change; that our military tortures the innocent and kills indiscriminately; and that our immigration policies are inhumane because our borders are not open.

We know the educational environment is increasingly hostile toward free speech, debate, Christianity, and toward our nation’s founding principles. Rarely a week goes by during which we fail to learn of another example of manufactured outrage or political correctness gone wild on a campus. North Carolina State recently eliminated Good Friday from its university calendar, despite enormous backlash.

In our backyard, a few teachers at The O’Neal School in Southern Pines walked out during a January speech by black civil rights legend Clarence Henderson, an avowed conservative Republican and supporter of President Trump.

These snowflake teachers apparently never considered how their decision will be interpreted by their students, but the big take away is that disrespecting American icons is OK if you disagree with them ideologically. Is O’Neal suspending these teachers or is it reprimanding the ones who did not walk out?

My mentee is in seventh grade at Southern Middle School. I ask almost every time we get together about his classes and teachers. He mentioned learning about World War I, and about Germany’s Adolf Hitler. What he remembers about Hitler is that he wore a funny mustache because the ends of it were damaged while Hitler wore a gas mask. (Actually, historians write that Hitler cropped his mustache to accommodate wearing a gas mask). There was no mention by the teenager that Hitler ordered the slaughter of millions of Jews, leaving me to wonder if this is excluded from the textbook.

This lone conversation reinforced why I mentor. It’s not my job to take his mind off his dire living conditions, his hunger and his uncertainty, although I hope I do. It is my job to focus his mind on his future, on where paths before him can lead, on why he needs to make smart decisions, and on why there is eternal hope because God loves him and because he dwells in a land that is free and prosperous.

President Reagan reminded us that freedom is but one generation removed from extinction, and that the tenants of what make us free must be rigorously handed down to future generations. He said, “We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream.”

Mentoring is one of the best opportunities an American adult can seize upon to counter the tide of anti-Americanism, anti-religion and anti-capitalism driven by the sinister and mentally unstable radical left, by educators, the media and the entertainment industry.

The teenager who sits to my right as we drive along is remarkably sunny, polite and articulate. But our nation is increasingly plagued by unhappy, disrespectful, mumbling teens. The why is disheartening but, perhaps, not irreversible.

“The reason so many young people are depressed, unhappy, and angry,” writes radio talk host and columnist Dennis Prager, “is the left has told them that God and Judeo-Christian religions are nonsense; their country is largely evil; their past is deplorable; and their future is hopeless.”

Nancy Pelosi rips in half a story of America’s comeback on national television. And why? Because she and her compliant radical army on the left would rather nurture hungry, deprived teens pouring across our Southern border, leaving desperate teens in Moore County to languish under the oppressive boot heel of government subsidies, which guarantee to keep them right where they are.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Awakening

By Jim Lexo

I am a lifelong Republican, starting with helping my parents campaign for Dwight Eisenhower. I was very young. Throughout the years I embraced the Republican principles of balanced budgets, strong national defense, individual rights and the other common sense principles that make for a strong, viable Republic.

When Donald Trump came on the scene I thought there was no way this guy could win, and no way will he be capable of representing Republicans. One of the Republican Governors or Senators will surely win the nomination went the conventional wisdom. Having worked in the “traditional” wing of the party I was not tuned into the growing conservative bloc of voters who felt there was little difference between the parties. No matter who gets elected, they concluded, we keep drifting to the left.

Surf to Victory capSo Trump is elected and does and says things that initially appear to be outrageous. He tells our NATO allies they need to start carrying their weight on the cost of defending Europe. He starts what looks to be trade wars with China, Mexico, Canada and Europe (free trade Republicans go crazy).  He calls the leader of a rogue nation (North Korea) that has nuclear capabilities “Little Rocket Man”.  He kills the Iran nuclear “deal”. He tells the U.N. we are not going to give foreign aid to nations that do not support our goals. On and on. You get the idea. Finally, a President who says things we all think about but are too afraid to say out loud.

Despite the second guessing, negative reports and high drama, it turns out Trump has been right on all the issues.  We are getting better trade deals; rogue nations are falling in line; allies are not taking advantage of us like they used to; mortal enemies are afraid to make a move because they don’t know how Trump might respond, and so on.

My point is that Trump has awakened me to the fact that “business as usual” had us on the path to socialism and basic ruination. Would a Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio or Scott Walker been able to achieve all of the accomplishments Trump’s administration has in less than two years? I doubt it. Trump’s bold moves have resulted in positive outcomes that may very well allow America to remain the greatest nation for another century.

What it took was someone who knew what he wanted to accomplish and how to make it happen. This bold, new Republican era must be sustained by a red wave of voter turnout, both during early voting and at the polls, through November 6. Trump’s achievements can not be repeated too often as we work in our communities to get out the vote.

Taxing distortions

In a Twitter post, North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis this week called out a Washington Post reporter’s visit to Burlington, NC, where he sought to demonstrate that pending Republican legislation to cut taxes and liberate businesses offers little relief to the little guy. The premise of the Post report is that the state’s tax cutting endeavors have done next to nothing to help small business so, by extension, federal tax relief is likely to have minimal impact going forward.

The Post obviously assigned the reporter to find a rural business owner who is, for whatever reason, an unhappy camper in a state where many businesses are thriving, and into which new businesses are relocating.

The extremes to which the Left is going to stop the unleashing of the full potential of the American economy is not limited to the corrupt mainstream media. It is seeping into our own community.

Apparently, it is the policy of our local liberal house organ, The Pilot newspaper, to allow a reader to submit a letter-to-the-editor that does little more than regurgitate extreme Left Wing talking points. There is scarcely a thread of truth in this missive by the misinformed Ms. MeNeish. She laments over “a few years of tiny (tax) cuts”. About half the U.S. population pays no federal or state taxes, thus can not be granted a “cut”. The highest producers (in the 39.6% bracket) are not likely to see a federal tax cut, even a tiny one, and some very high earners might find themselves in a new 45% bracket, pending the final terms of the bill. The author also claims tax reform will “make it harder for young people to go to college”. This obviously is drawn from warnings by people such as University of North Carolina President Maragaret Spellings who oppose the removal of tax deductions for private giving (to schools such as UNC). But why does she assume that, for example, a UNC alum who owns a successful business, would not give more to the school as his tax burden declines, even absent a deduction for his charitable activity? This seems to suggest that her alums care little about the institution but give only to add a deduction to their filings. Quite an insult. How, you ask, does the elimination of private giving deductions “make it harder for young people to go to college”? Because the Left accepts that tuitions must continue to skyrocket and, thus, youngsters will need academic scholarships more than ever. Left unsaid is that many of these scholarships go to students who are not U.S. citizens.

Ms. MeNeish also wrings her wrists about tax reform burdening “our children and grandchildren with more than $1 trillion in addtional federal debt.” This is based on models that are typically inaccurate and on the smear campaign now being waged by billionaire investor Tom Steyer, who writes this week in the Wall Street Journal that tax cuts for “the wealthy” will be “paid for with money taken out of the pockets of working Americans and their children.” This outlook defies the outcomes of the economic impact of the last sweeping reform, under President Reagan in 1986, which handed President Clinton a booming economy throughout the 1990s. Projected debt increases under the current government spending trajectory — apart from tax reform becoming reality — far exceed $1 trillion over the next decade (the Congressional Budget Office estimates $10 million). Easy to dismiss, apparently. But, worse, her misgivings also conveniently ignore the $9 trillion in federal debt added during the eight unchecked years of spending under President Obama. Are her children and grandchildren somehow unscathed by Obama’s reckless legacy?